A valuable business tool: Buy-sell agreements

When you own a company, by yourself or together with one or more partners, you pour heart and soul into making it a success. Indeed, the process of bringing a business into existence and then nurturing it and building upon its success is so engrossing and exhilarating that it’s easy to lose sight of one sobering fact: You and each of your co-owners (partners or shareholders) one day will take leave of the company. It may be by retirement, disability or death. Someone may feel the need to move on. A partner may be tempted by a third party’s offer for his or her share of the enterprise.
Potentially, any of these situations can throw a going business and/or the family of a deceased owner into chaos. A family may be forced to sell its share to cover taxes on the estate—if it can find a willing buyer. Remaining partners may not be able to get along with an interloper who comes into the business through purchase or inheritance. In an S corporation, the new shareholder may not be of a class eligible to hold such shares, thus forcing a reorganization.
A versatile tool
Buy-sell agreements provide a powerful business succession tool that owners of small-to-medium-sized companies can use to address any or all of these eventualities. A form of shareholder agreement, the buy-sell agreement is a contract spelling out what will happen to the equity of a departing shareholder when a “triggering” event occurs.
Buy-sell agreements will generally fall into one of two categories:
In a cross-purchase agreement, the shares or interest of the departing partner are to be bought by the surviving or remaining partners. In a sole proprietorship, the designated purchaser would be the owner’s chosen successor, whether a family member involved in the business or a key employee vital to its continuation.
In a stock redemption plan, the equity or shares are bought and retired by the corporation or partnership, thereby increasing the remaining shareholders’ share of the company’s equity.
The choice between these options will depend on the company’s structure and the resources available to fund the purchase. Agreements may set varying terms for different triggering events. For example, a lower price may be paid to a partner leaving to set up a competing business. Purchases might be mandatory upon the death or disability of a partner, whereas voluntary or forced withdrawals might give the business only “the right of first refusal”—to match a first legitimate outside offer, if it so chooses.
Funding choices
Often life insurance and, less frequently, disability insurance are used to fund buy-sell agreements. The contractual buyer purchases a policy on the prospective seller’s life. The proceeds are earmarked to purchase the business interest from the heirs of the deceased owner, and the cash value is available to fund purchases in other situations. In cross-purchase agreements each owner needs to have a policy on the life of each of the other owners.
Because this process can be quite cumbersome when there are multiple owners, a stock redemption plan may be more workable. In that case, the business owns and funds a single policy on each owner’s life. Life insurance cash value is carried as an asset on the corporate balance sheet and will not be considered an excess accumulation of earnings if it does not exceed the reasonable needs of the business.
The hard part
Placing a value on a closely held business can be a challenge. Placing a future value is nigh on impossible. For this reason it may be best to specify a reasonable method that will be used to determine the price to be paid, or to recalculate the price periodically.
Methods that may be appropriate, depending on the nature of the business, can be to: capitalize average earnings over a period of years; calculate the loan amount that the company’s cash flow will support; total the tangible assets on the balance sheet; place a value on the business’ intangible assets (often its customer base); or simply apply an industry rule of thumb. Any method specified in a buy-sell arrangement that represents a true arm’s length valuation will be binding on the IRS for estate tax purposes.
The payoff
A well-structured buy-sell agreement can provide a panoply of benefits:
• ensuring an orderly transfer of business interests, preventing forced liquidation;
• protecting the heirs of minority owners who otherwise might end up with a holding of restricted, non-dividend-paying stock;
• preventing a sale to outsiders or inheritance by someone not active in the business;
• persuading a key employee to remain in the business;
• establishing the value of a deceased owner’s shares for estate tax purposes.
If you run a business, we’re always ready to work with you and your advisers to develop buy-sell agreements and all other financial services available to help your enterprise thrive.

© 2014 M.A. Co. All rights reserved.
Any developments occurring after January 1, 2014, are not reflected in this article.

 

 

Anonymous wealth

What would you do if you suddenly came into a lot of money? Such as, for example, winning a $144 million Powerball jackpot? That was the question faced by a long-time Washington, D.C., resident who bought a single $1 lottery ticket with the numbers randomly selected.

An early decision was to take the lump sum, not the annuity, perhaps because he was 82 years old. That reduced the jackpot to $79.6 million. The man’s attorney estimates that the sum will be reduced further by income taxes to $60 million.

Still, that’s a lot of money, and a lot of responsibility. This individual decided that he wanted to remain anonymous. He hired an attorney and created a limited liability company to receive the proceeds, which then will pass to three trusts. One trust will provide for the education of the man’s ten children and 47 grandchildren. A second trust will meet their health care expenses. The third and final trust is for charitable giving.

Lottery officials reportedly were very disappointed that they were not able to present the big check to the big winner. On the back of the lottery ticket is fine print that asserts the owner of the winning ticket grants the lottery the right to use a photograph, together with the winner’s name and residence, for publicity purposes. Creation of an entity to receive the proceeds is legal to circumvent this requirement.

Why would someone with sudden wealth want to preserve anonymity? Because he wanted to preserve a normal life. The winner’s lawyer said that his office received 80 telephone calls just the first morning after it was revealed that his client had won the jackpot. Most were solicitations, requests for charitable gifts. One would have to take the telephone off the hook, and perhaps get an unlisted number to boot, to avoid such an assault.
The identity of the trustee was not mentioned in the press reports. Choosing the right trustee could help with the professional management of such a game-changing sum of money.

© 2014 M.A. Co. All rights reserved.
Any developments occurring after January 1, 2014, are not reflected in this article.

 

 

An Amish Ponzi schemer?

According to SEC reports, Monroe L. Beachy began offering investments to Amish families in 1986. His success in making his pitch was tied to the fact that he himself was Amish. Beachy promised higher returns than those available from banks, coupled with the safety of investing in U.S. Treasury bonds. Does that sound familiar? Over the next 25 years, he raised $33 million from some 2,600 investors, most of whom were Amish.
Unfortunately, Beachy’s operation had more in common with Bernard Madoff’s investment program than just its sales pitch. He apparently became insolvent as early as July 1998, but stayed in business by using money from new investors to pay off old ones. That is what is known as a Ponzi scheme. Some of the money that Beachy managed was invested in dot-com companies, many of which tanked in 2000. Such investments are ironic, given that many Amish avoid modern technology as a matter of religious principle. These details have come to light now because Beachy filed for personal bankruptcy last year.

Although it may seem remarkable that this fraud continued for 25 years, it shouldn’t be surprising. Beachy took advantage of the unique trust that members of the Amish community have in each other. This is known as “affinity fraud,” preying upon those in one’s social or professional group. Very often people do not hold their peers to the same level of skepticism or supervision that they do those outside the group.
Whom should you trust? When it comes to managing your investments, this is the fundamental question. Always investigate before you invest. When it sounds too good to be true, it’s almost always not true.

© 2014 M.A. Co. All rights reserved.
Any developments occurring after January 1, 2014, are not reflected in this article.